• Google

    The Birth of Law Reports /Link



    Published law reports are an essential component of a common-law system. Without knowing what a prior case held or said, how can anyone follow precedent? But the system of law reports that we have evolved in a haphazard manner. Until well into the nineteenth century, reports were put together by private individuals (sometimes on their own and sometimes hired by a court) or by the judge. As a result, many of the law reports that we have from early American cases are incomplete or missing.

    One of Bushrod Washington’s many contributions was in getting more reports done. As a private...


    Published law reports are an essential component of a common-law system. Without knowing what a prior case held or said, how can anyone follow precedent? But the system of law reports that we have evolved in a haphazard manner. Until well into the nineteenth century, reports were put together by private individuals (sometimes on their own and sometimes hired by a court) or by the judge. As a result, many of the law reports that we have from early American cases are incomplete or missing.

    One of Bushrod Washington’s many contributions was in getting more reports done. As a private practitioner, he published volumes on the opinions of the Virginia Supreme Court based on his notes. As a Supreme Court Justice, he worked to get reports of his circuit cases published in a more diligent manner than many of his colleagues.

    Of course, there was a selfish aspect to this. Disseminating his own opinions increased Justice Washington’s influence. There was also selective bias at work. In my research, I have found some notes that Washington made for the preparation of circuit reports, where he explains how his oral statement about the case should be modified prior to publication. Sometimes he suggested revisions to clarify what was said, but sometimes he did so to correct an error he felt he had made.

    There are also one set of cases that Washington never reported–his trials involving the Alien and Sedition Acts. This omission is probably not an accident, given how controversial those cases were. This is on reason why taking control of the reports away from the courts was a sound change.



    (@)Gerard Magliocca

    Published on 12 Jul 2018 at 06:14PM

    Concurring Opinions The Free Market in Automated Options Trading A Comment on Dayid Cay Johnston’s The Making of Donald Trump  By William K. Black Associate Professor of Economics and Law, UMKC Happy trails to you, until we meet again . . . Anti-spam image The Birth of Law Reports ROUNDUP: Law and Humanities 07.11.18 FAN 196 (First Amendment News) Special Issue: 20 New or Forthcoming Books



















  • Recent Posts








    ^Comments